4 Locations Most Likely To Survive Nuclear War

Do you think you could survive a nuclear war? When people imagine a nuclear war, they’re often picturing a cataclysmic event that leaves the world annihilated and futile. They imagine a dark and grim nightmare. But the reality of such devastation is far more complex, nuanced and larger than you could ever imagine. 

While there isn’t a place on the planet that could escape the impact and effects of a nuclear war, there are some locations that are more likely to survive the totalitarian impact. Some parts of the globe are more naturally positioned to avoid direct strikes and be able to recover quickly from such a fractured act. We’re exploring four locations that are most likely to survive a nuclear war and why their unique characteristics and location set them apart from the majority of the world.

1. Iceland

Iceland is a country that’s thought to be most likely to avoid any direct devastation in a nuclear war attack. The combination of the country being isolated, self-sufficient in energy and resources and various environmental advantages gives it a boost in its survivability.

Iceland is located in the North Atlantic ocean. It’s very remote and therefore less likely to be a target in global conflicts. The country is without a standing army of its own and has a small, sparsely distributed population, which therefore decreases the chance of mass casualties in the event of a nuclear attack. 

Iceland generates nearly all of its own electricity and heating from renewable sources and its power systems are already resilient and independent. Iceland has very strong infrastructure built to withstand extreme conditions and maintains a stable political position. It’s unlikely to be a target and most likely to be able to effectively deal with the fallout of a nuclear war.

Reasons Iceland Is Likely To Survive Nuclear War:

• Iceland sits alone in the North Atlantic Ocean, far away from big continents and conflict zones.
• The country is not a valuable strike location.
• Iceland relies on geothermal and hydroelectric power so even in the event that global fuel supply chains collapse, the country can still maintain electricity and heating.
• The country”s resources support long-term self-sufficiency.

2. Patagonia (Southern Argentina & Chile)

Patagonia (including Southern Argentina and Chile) is another location most likely to survive a nuclear war. The country offers extreme remoteness and a small population density. There are many vast stretches of land that are completely uninhabited or very sparsely inhabited. This lowers the chance of extensive mass casualties or being a global target. 

Patagonia is located far away from any major conflict zones. It’s a country that offers several survival advantages, such as an abundance of fresh water and fertile soil that’s good for both agriculture and livestock. These natural resources could support communities should global supply chains become disrupted.

Why Patagonia Would Survive Nuclear War:

• The country has limited military bases and weapons facilities (making it unlikely to be a target.)
• Patagonia food production is safe and without heavy reliance on imports.
• There aren’t any dense urban hubs (lower chances of secondary effects like fires or infrastructure collapse.)
• Patagonia could offer many natural shelter options like mountains and valleys that can offer physical protection.
• The cold and windy climate of Patagonia would help disperse any radioactive particles.

3. New Zealand

New Zealand is located away from major military powers and global conflict zones. It’s a country that doesn’t have nuclear weapons of its’ own and has made its stance on nuclear weapons very clear. Because of this, the country is not a high-value target. 

New Zealand has a unique ability to sustain its population. This is because of its strong agriculture sector. New Zealand produces more food than its population requires, including dairy, meat, grains and produce. 

The country also has an abundance of fresh water. It’s well-established farming systems would help to protect its people during any devastation from a nuclear war. New Zealand benefits from a stable government and this stability would be critical in preventing widespread chaos during a global crisis.

Reasons New Zealand Could Survive Nuclear War:

• New Zealand is located far from military powers and conflict zones.
• The country has very low value as a nuclear target.
• New Zealand has had a longstanding nuclear-free stance.
• It is completely self-sufficient in food production and can support its population without relying on imported goods.
• New Zealand has significant renewable energy production, reducing its reliance on other countries.

4. Greenland

Greenland is a very remote Arctic country that is more likely than most, to survive a nuclear war. The country is unlikely to be directly impacted by the devastation of a nuclear attack for several reasons. It doesn’t have any strategic targets, major cities or urban hubs to easily justify an attack. The country has a very low population and what it does have is spread out across the land, further reducing the chances of mass casualties. Greenland is also politically stable and not a central player in global conflicts.

Important Reality Check About Nuclear War

• Even in these locations, nuclear war could/likely would cause devastating consequences.
• A nuclear war would disrupt global food distribution, which would impact the entire world.
• There could be climate disruptions with lower temperatures and reduced sunlight.
• The financial markets and currencies would likely be extremely impacted.
• There isn’t anywhere on the planet you could go to have immunity from the irreparable damage and destruction a nuclear war would bring.

Final Thoughts

In the end, if there were a nuclear war, these four locations would offer the highest possibility of survival. This is because they have an optimal location, away from global conflict zones, are self-sustaining and have a stable political stance. These four locations, Iceland, Patagonia, New Zealand and Greenland, offer citizens strong and stable energy sources, food production, agriculture, potential shelter and more. Now, these locations are most certainly not immune to the effects of a nuclear attack; they are the ones that are most likely to survive it. 

• British Family in Dubai Speak About Taking Shelter During “Potential Missile Strikes”
• Epstein Files Reveal Claim He Told Friend Princess Beatrice “Liked” Him
• Why Canada Is Critical to Any “Made in America” Vehicle Ambition
• Barack Obama Breaks Silence, Blasts Donald Trump Over Racist Video and Political Conduct
• UCLA Professor Faces Backlash After Advising Jeffrey Epstein on How to get babies to ‘suck harder on pacifiers’